Star Bank
v. Anderson

Agricultural litigation involving grain ownership, diverted sale proceeds and the rights of a corn buyer. Matthew Bialick and James Magnuson represented Star Bank in litigation arising from a grain-fronting arrangement. In the July 15, 2024 appeal, the Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment enforcing the bank's security interest against Bushmills Ethanol.

The agricultural dispute

The bank held a perfected security interest in a borrower’s crops. An ethanol producer bought corn through the borrower’s nephew and paid the nephew rather than satisfying the bank’s interest. The ensuing litigation required proof of who actually owned the corn and what rights continued after the sale.

The appellate result

The Court of Appeals affirmed a $352,831.47 judgment against Bushmills Ethanol. The evidence established that the corn belonged to the bank’s borrower even though it was sold through his nephew. Applying existing Minnesota Supreme Court precedent, the court held that the buyer did not take the corn free of Star Bank’s security interest.

The court also affirmed a $1,500 sanction for the buyer’s frivolous counterclaim. The opinion is expressly nonprecedential under Minnesota Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure 136.01, subdivision 1(c). It illustrates successful enforcement of existing law rather than establishing a new binding rule.

MJB Law’s role

The opinion identifies Matthew J. Bialick and James R. Magnuson of MJB Law Firm, together with Jacob B. Sellers, as counsel for respondent Star Bank. Bushmills Ethanol, Inc. was the appellant in this appeal.

The importance of the factual record

Agricultural products may move through related parties before reaching a buyer. Litigation can require reconstructing ownership, deliveries, payment and the relationship between the person selling the product and the person whose assets secure a loan. In this matter, admissions and delivery records were part of the evidence supporting the bank’s position.

The case illustrates the factual work agricultural disputes can require: establishing ownership, following deliveries and payments, and determining which rights continue after a sale. Those questions connect farm operations, product buyers and secured lenders. This appeal resolved the buyer's liability under secured-transactions law.

Read the opinion

Star Bank v. Anderson, No. A23-1802 (Minn. Ct. App. July 15, 2024) · Nonprecedential opinion · Affirmed.