Responding to a legal threat about a publication

A demand letter over an interview, post or other publication can create pressure to respond immediately. Before choosing a legal or public response, preserve the material and identify exactly what the other party claims is wrong.

Preserve the complete record

Keep the original recording, transcript, post or article and the surrounding context. Save the demand, related communications and relevant dates. A screenshot may be useful, but it may not capture an entire thread, recording, edit history or attachment.

Avoid deleting or altering potentially relevant material while seeking legal advice. If a correction, removal or new statement is being considered, discuss how to preserve the existing record first.

Identify the statement and the claim

Ask which words or disclosures are challenged, who made or published them, who received them and what relief is demanded. Claims about an allegedly false statement can raise different issues from claims about disclosure of assertedly private information.

The full context matters. A brief excerpt can omit qualifications, questions, surrounding discussion or information already in the public record.

Check the procedure and the requested response

A letter, a filed complaint and a court order require different attention. Identify the court, if any, the documents served and the dates on them. Have counsel evaluate the response requirements and whether any early procedure or defense may apply in that forum.

Consider the effect of another public statement

A public response can reach a wider audience and become part of the dispute. Legal strategy and communications decisions should be considered together. Keep proposed responses available for counsel to review before publication where possible.

Make the first discussion useful

  • Identify the parties and their roles in the publication.
  • Describe the type of material and where it appeared.
  • Identify any filed case, notice, hearing or response date.
  • Explain the immediate decision you need to make.
  • Arrange a conflict check before sending confidential documents or a detailed factual account.

Matthew Bialick handles selected First Amendment and privacy litigation matters. Learn more about Matthew’s background or contact the firm about a potential dispute.